Articles delegate-en/4800-4900 of [1-5169] on the server localhost:119
  upper oldest olders older1 this newer1 newers latest
search
[Top/Up] [oldest] - [Older+chunk] - [Newer+chunk] - [newest + Check]
range 4800 - 4900   digest:
FTP to HTTP Protocol Translation Gateway
  05/07-02:08 . 4800  David Fogarty <pxyjabdyi-rn3efjjgkilr.ml@ml.delegate.org> [53]
___ Hi Yutaka, Thank you for your quick and detailed response. You confirmed what I suspected. I will look for other means of accomplishing my goals. Thanks again, Dave Fogarty Senior System Administrat
Delegate 9.9.6 SFTP listing timeout
  05/07-13:42 . 4801  Vijay Pandit <pyejabdyi-rn3efjjgkilr.ml@ml.delegate.org> [33]
___ Hello Yutaka, Using Delegate 9.9.6 as a FTP/SFTP proxy, and found that if there are a large number of files in the SFTP server folder, a directory listing times out after 30 sec and returns a empty
  05/08-14:15 . 4802  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [24]
___ Hi, It is as expected if the timeout is "60 seconds" and if there is a statement in a logfile as follows: 05/08 14:13:02.06 [27474] 1+0/2: --SFTP relay_list(ls -l ) slow (60.0) rdy=0 I'm not sure wh
yysh issues.
  05/12-18:06 . 4803  Corley Kinnane <pymjabdyi-rn3efjjgkilr.ml@ml.delegate.org> [34]
___ Hi, I have been using Delegate on and off for years, mainly as an HTTP proxy and tcprelay tool. Recently I discovered the new yysh feature. It looks very promising. I tried using OpenVPN to a server
  05/13-03:04 . 4804  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [53]
___ Hi, Maybe you got nothing via it and saw a text cached in your browser. You should have seen what is wrong in the LOGFILE on the server side. In this case there should be "No permission" in your log
  05/13-03:34 . 4805  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [27]
___ If you mean a host name resolusion is not available on the YYSH server side, you should use the YYSH server as a SOCKS proxy rather than a HTTP proxy, and do the resolution at the client side with a
  05/13-16:43 . 4806  <pymjabdyi-rn3efjjgkilr.ml@ml.delegate.org> [47]
___ On Thu, 13 May 2010 03:34:28 +0900 (JST), feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka The N900 uses its own DNS proxy by default so that when a connection is changed and therefore all the routing, the proxy is re
  05/13-17:24 . 4807  <pymjabdyi-rn3efjjgkilr.ml@ml.delegate.org> [85]
___ On Thu, 13 May 2010 03:04:23 +0900 (JST), feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka to Yes - I'll include that - thanks. Ok, yes probably need that too. I assumed these flags had to be present on both sides of
  05/14-08:52 . 4808  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [32]
___ Hi, Hmm... it might be because you are using a kind of automatic proxy configuration (by .pac file) based on domain names or have a static exclusion list of destination hosts in your browser configu
  05/17-09:09 . 4809  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [33]
___ Hi, I found the reason. The HTTP proxy over yysh is implemented as multiple threads in a yysh server process. Each proxy thread was rejecting secondary requests over a connection in "keep-alive" wit
FTPxHTTP by DeleGate (Re: FTP to HTTP Protocol Translation Gateway)
  05/17-17:25 . 4810  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [114]
___ David, I've been interested in relaying FTP over HTTP (or HTTPS), or using a HTTP (HTTPS) server just to provide a file transfer service as a FTP server does. HTTP is a protocol that is easily route
rsync with proxy
  05/19-19:01 . 4811  Michel Urvoy <pzmjabdyi-rn3efjjgkilr.ml@ml.delegate.org> [7]
___ Hi, I currently use an archlinux box an I run delegate -P192.168.0.30:3128 as a service on a w2k box for my http/ftp access. Package management like ABS use rsync on port 873 to download and i want
DeleGate has been granted the Famous Software Award - Download.FamousWhy.com
  05/19-22:27 . 4812  pzqjabdyi-rn3efjjgkilr.ml@ml.delegate.org [34]
___ Hello, Congratulations! Your product "DeleGate (http://download.famouswhy.com/delegate/)" has been granted the "Famous Software Award" by Download.FamousWhy.com. The Famous Software Award has been i
rsync with proxy
  05/20-12:50 . 4813  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [24]
___ Hi, It is possible to let DeleGate work for multiple-protocols but in your case it is recommended to simply add another DeleGate just for rsync as follows for example: delegated -P873 SERVER=tcprela
  05/20-13:09 . 4814  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [31]
___ Or if your rsync client assumes using HTTP proxy as a SSL-tunnel for arbitrary rsync servers, the configuration should be like this: delegated -P8080 SERVER=http REMITTABLE=+,ssltunnel Or you can co
SSL-Problem
  05/25-21:01 . 4815  "Bernhard Rauh" <pjejabdyi-rn3efjjgkilr.ml@ml.delegate.org> [170]
___ Hello Yutaka, after update my delegate from version 9.9.6 to 9.9.7 the connection in the browser ends with error message "The page requires a client certificate". We use the delegate as http2https-p
  05/26-04:33 . 4816  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [28]
___ Hi, I don't know the reason but comparing the logs of DeleGate, especially with the TLSCONF="-vd" option, for each version and finding the difference between them will give us hints. Cheers, Yutaka
  05/26-22:51 . 4817  "Bernhard Rauh" <pjejabdyi-rn3efjjgkilr.ml@ml.delegate.org> [318]
___ Hi, I have generated the log-files for two versions - see attachment. Cheers, Bernhard ---Ursprngliche Nachricht--- Von: Yutaka Sato [mailto:feedback@delegate.org] Gesendet: Dienstag, 25. Mai 2010 2
  05/27-00:12 . 4818  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [34]
___ Bernhard, Thank you for your logging. In the logging, I saw that your sslway does not load the certificate specified in the argument. And I could reproduce it happens in DeleGate versions after 9.9.
  05/27-02:51 . 4819  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [58]
___ Bernhard, Firstly I doubted that maybe I disabled sslway arguments intentionally in the revision, but reviewing the code I found that it was just my mistake :-) I'll fix it as the enclosed patch in
FTP/SFTP Gateway PASV port re-use
  05/30-21:02 . 4820  Vijay Pandit <pyejabdyi-rn3efjjgkilr.ml@ml.delegate.org> [103]
___ Hi Yutaka, I am using Delegate 9.9.7 as a FTP/SFTP gateway. Find that after some files are transferred successfully, Delegate starts re-using the port it allocates for the PASV command for the data
SSL-Problem
  05/31-16:17 . 4821  "Bernhard Rauh" <pjejabdyi-rn3efjjgkilr.ml@ml.delegate.org> [103]
___ Dear Yutaka, I have tested the new version (delegate9.9.8-pre4) and it work's very well! Also I have configured the delegate like this and it work's fine: Thank's for your support! Cheers, Bernhard
FTP/SFTP Gateway PASV port re-use
  05/31-17:38 . 4822  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [42]
___ Hi, I need a little more log at least from the last successful transmission of retrieved file to the first failure shown in these lines. Cheers, Yutaka 9 9 Yutaka Sato <y.sato@delegate.org> http://d
  05/31-21:36 . 4823  Vijay Pandit <pyejabdyi-rn3efjjgkilr.ml@ml.delegate.org> [293]
___ Hi Yutaka, I have attached the log file portion the last two successful transfers and the start of the failed transfers Cheers Vijay
  06/03-01:28 . 4824  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [49]
___ Vijay, Thank you for the log file. I found "---FIFO unlink(/tmp/dg-sftpgw/..." in your log file that caused the transmission error, and "errno=24" maybe for "Too many open files" to be cause of the
  06/03-23:32 . 4825  Vijay Pandit <pyejabdyi-rn3efjjgkilr.ml@ml.delegate.org> [157]
___ Hi Yutaka, I applied the patch to *9.9.8-pre5* and compiled. Tested and it works fine! Thank you for your support. Cheers Vijay
V9.9.5
  06/08-13:43 . 4826  Ken Maynard <p3ijabdyi-rn3efjjgkilr.ml@ml.delegate.org> [21]
___ Hi I am running DG 9.9.5 as a service on Windows 2003. I have this in the conf file for logfiles: LOGFILE='${PORT}[date+-%d.log]' The problem is that for date n, the logging is appended to an existi
  06/09-08:29 . 4827  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [35]
___ Hi, Yes. Yes, or you need to specify the logfile name format not to be repeated as follows for example: LOGFILE='${PORT}[date+-%d-%m-%y.log]' Yes. You need specify "PROTOLOG" for the file as "LOGFIL
  06/09-12:03 . 4828  Ken Maynard <p3ijabdyi-rn3efjjgkilr.ml@ml.delegate.org> [12]
___ Thanks for the info on log files. Another question now, if that's OK. I want to influence the behaviour of index crawlers. Can I alter the contents of robots.txt? I can't find such a file, so I assu
  06/09-12:23 . 4829  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [25]
___ Ken, Assuming that you are using DeleGate as a "reverse proxy", it is directly replaced with a MOUNT option as follows for example. MOUNT="/robots.txt file:C:/temp/robots.txt" Also you can modify th
  06/09-21:44 . 4830  Ken Maynard <p3ijabdyi-rn3efjjgkilr.ml@ml.delegate.org> [35]
___ Great. Thanks again. Ken Maynard, 83 Canterbury Street, Lyttelton, NZ 8082 Tel: (00) 000 0002 Fax: (00) 000 0002 Mobile: 000 000 00X +00 0 000 000f +00 0 000 000f +00 00 000 00f
FTP/FTPs allow/disallow encryption according to incoming port
  06/10-05:33 . 4831  Eduardo Alvarenga <p34jabdyi-rn3efjjgkilr.ml@ml.delegate.org> [99]
___ I wonder if there is any way to make sslway know from which port a connection is coming from and filter according to that. If connection comes on port 21, then allow both SSL and non-SSL sections to
RES_NS not following SRCIF instruction in Delegate 9.9.7
  06/10-17:02 . 4833  Chris Murton <p4ejabdyi-rn3efjjgkilr.ml@ml.delegate.org> [26]
___ Hi, I've recently had cause to force certain DNS servers for use by delegate (that do not follow those of resolv.conf, etc), and already have SRCIF defined for outbound IPv4/IPv6 connections. I've n
FTP/FTPs allow/disallow encryption according to incoming port
  06/10-17:23 . 4834  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [37]
___ Hi, The simplest way is to divide your server to two servers, one for FTP clients (with SERVER=ftp STLS="-fcl" -P21) and one for FTPS clients (with SERVER=ftps STLS=fcl -P990). If you need to do it
  06/10-22:23 . 4835  Eduardo Alvarenga <p34jabdyi-rn3efjjgkilr.ml@ml.delegate.org> [144]
___ Yutaka, Thanks for replying. I tried the following, without success. Plain text is still allowed on port 990. -P10.3.81.3:990,127.0.0.1:990,10.3.81.3:21,127.0.0.1:21 SERVER="ftps://127.0.0.1:3021:-P
  06/11-08:18 . 4836  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [36]
___ Hi, There must be ":-:" for the delimiter as in the following example I wrote. See <URL:http://www.delegate.org/delegate/Manual.htm#SERVER_mount> Cheers, Yutaka 9 9 Yutaka Sato <y.sato@delegate.org>
  06/11-09:30 . 4837  Eduardo Alvarenga <p34jabdyi-rn3efjjgkilr.ml@ml.delegate.org> [155]
___ Yutaka, My internal FTP server 127.0.0.1:3021 is *not* SSL/TLS aware. FTP SSL connections on port 990 should be forwarded by DeleGate to localhost:3021 using plain text and then translated back to t
RES_NS not following SRCIF instruction in Delegate 9.9.7
  06/11-11:29 . 4838  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [145]
___ Hi Chris, Since the SRCIF parameter was introduced for TCP connection for the server of application procotols, it is natural that it is not applied to a supporting protocol over UDP. Here is the sim
FTP/FTPs allow/disallow encryption according to incoming port
  06/11-11:46 . 4839  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [36]
___ Hi, Currently I have no time to survey your case but it might be solved by switching STLS by client-side port, not by the protocol with SERVER. STLS="fcl:*:*:-P990" STLS="-fcl:*:*:-P21" Cheers, Yuta
RES_NS not following SRCIF instruction in Delegate 9.9.7
  06/11-17:21 . 4840  Chris Murton <p4ejabdyi-rn3efjjgkilr.ml@ml.delegate.org> [188]
___ Hi Yutaka, As ever, a lightning fast response and solution. I've patched the larger update into delegate9.9.8-pre5 and it's working perfectly, thank you for your time and dedication! Cheers, Chris -
FTP/FTPs allow/disallow encryption according to incoming port
  06/12-02:05 . 4841  Eduardo Alvarenga <p34jabdyi-rn3efjjgkilr.ml@ml.delegate.org> [170]
___ Thanks Yutaka! Now, I have it working. SSL is accepted everywhere and plain text only on port 21. Here's my conf, for history purposes (and help others) DGCONF=/opt/delegated/bin/delegated.conf DGRO
RES_NS not following SRCIF instruction in Delegate 9.9.7
  06/12-13:33 . 4842  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [171]
___ Chris, It took several minutes to make and test the smaller patch. It took other ten minutes for larger one without conditional matching as "SRCIF=Addr:0:dns". But when I tried to enable the full fu
pop -> pop3s
  06/13-22:36 . 4843  Wiktor Adamski <p5mjabdyi-rn3efjjgkilr.ml@ml.delegate.org> [312]
___ I'm trying to make DeleGate to connect using SSL to POP3 server while connecting to DeleGate without SSL. Because it didn't work I'v started with something simpler: dg9_9_7.exe -vv STLS="fsv,fcl" -P
  06/17-10:16 . 4844  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [26]
___ At least it must have been STLS="fsv" for your usage. Doing it simply without MOUNT and POP as follows might solve the case: STLS=fsv -P995 SERVER=tcprelay://server:995 Cheers, Yutaka 9 9 Yutaka Sat
  06/17-14:31 . 4845  Wiktor Adamski <p5mjabdyi-rn3efjjgkilr.ml@ml.delegate.org> [10]
___ Thank you, it works. Kup wlasne mieszkanie za 72 tys. zl.
PERMIT strange behaviour
  06/17-20:53 . 4846  frederic montiton <pbijabdyi-rn3efjjgkilr.ml@ml.delegate.org> [173]
___ Konichiwa Yutaka, I've found a strange problem with the Telnet Proxy : when I add a PERMIT control in my configuration files and use a script to processed the connection, string characters forwarded
Logs tcprelay: ignore OOB?
  06/18-01:23 . 4847  Diane J <p54jabdyi-rn3efjjgkilr.ml@ml.delegate.org> [116]
___ HI, The logs for /var/spool/delegate-nobody/log/80 is filling up. The messages that appears most is: How do I stop these messages? and is the a way to make the log rotate after the become a certain
  06/18-08:00 . 4848  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [35]
___ Hi, It depends on the version of your DeleGate and your OS. A known problem occurs with DeleGate older than 9.9.7 on FreeBSD 8. [CHANGES] 9.9.7 100309 fix nbio.c: fixed inf. loop in SSLtunnel on Fre
PERMIT strange behaviour
  06/18-09:53 . 4849  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [66]
___ Hi, No. I can't reproduce the problem. It might depend on the version of your DeleGate, your OS and your Telnet client program. Seeing the detailed behavior of DeleGate with "-vd" option may help us
Logs tcprelay: ignore OOB?
  06/18-21:58 . 4850  Diane J <p54jabdyi-rn3efjjgkilr.ml@ml.delegate.org> [46]
___ We are using FreeBSD 8 & have version 9.9.7. How do we fix it? ---Original Message--- From: Yutaka Sato [mailto:feedback@delegate.org] Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2010 6:01 PM To: feedback@delegate.org
  06/19-03:06 . 4851  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [79]
___ DeleGate after 9.9.7 includes a self-diag. function for the infinite "OOB" problem. It is expected to make diagnostic output as follows: % delegated -Fseltest [FreeBSD/8.0] rdy = 0 0 (0) issock=1/1
  06/19-03:14 . 4852  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [23]
___ And if your log does not have the extended information, it is 9.9.6 or older. You can see the version of your DeleGate with the following command: % delegated -Fver Just upgrade to 9.9.7 or newer. C
Delegate connection dropping
  06/22-05:09 . 4853  Diane J <p54jabdyi-rn3efjjgkilr.ml@ml.delegate.org> [162]
___ Hi, Delegate connection dropping. Operating system: FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE Delegate version: DeleGate/9.9.3 ps -axjf shows process: delegated -{533:2435/533}[RPM=17.96(0.0 0.0 0.0),IDLE=1027s]-P80 -- -
  06/22-09:03 . 4854  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [34]
___ You should read my former messages and upgrade to DeleGate/9.9.7. Cheers, Yutaka 9 9 Yutaka Sato <y.sato@delegate.org> http://delegate.org/y.sato/ ( ~ ) National Institute of Advanced Industrial Sci
Mount - 404 on some page images/links
  06/25-10:45 . 4855  "Beutel, Philip" <p64jabdyi-rn3efjjgkilr.ml@ml.delegate.org> [67]
___ Hi, I have Delegate setup with the following MOUNT to redirect requests out to a target HTTP server. MOUNT="/wayside/CCTV/GLENMORE/CAM1/* http://GLENMORE:8080/*" On the Delegate machine I use http:/
  06/25-13:53 . 4856  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [27]
___ Hi, A possible reason of the problem is that URLs that was not redirected are written not in HTML tags but in somewhere else in a response data from the server, typically in JavaScript, XML or so. Y
  06/25-14:51 . 4857  "Beutel, Philip" <p64jabdyi-rn3efjjgkilr.ml@ml.delegate.org> [42]
___ Thanks Yutaka, That solved a lot of the problems - only one remains. The form has some buttons on it, the buttons link to other pages, when I look at the source of the page the links aren't being 'f
  06/25-15:38 . 4858  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [46]
___ Phil, Sigh... I hate JavaScript because of its uglyness and difficulty for finding URL string components scattered and calculated in it. <!-- form button Admin Menu--><input type="button" class="kle
Problem with delegate proxy
  06/25-18:39 . 4859  Ht Ht2 <p7mjabdyi-rn3efjjgkilr.ml@ml.delegate.org> [291]
___ hi yutaka, first of all let me say thank you for your wonderful tool. i am writing to you because we are facing a problem and i could not find anything similar on the delegate knowledge base. we imp
  06/26-10:02 . 4860  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [37]
___ Hi, It is highly possible that your problem is one of defects fixed in versions newer than yours, as the CHANGES records: [CHANGES] Cheers, Yutaka 9 9 Yutaka Sato <y.sato@delegate.org> http://delega
Mount - 404 on some page images/links
  06/28-07:30 . 4861  "Beutel, Philip" <p64jabdyi-rn3efjjgkilr.ml@ml.delegate.org> [25]
___ Hi Yutaka, The '!' is actually in there but only in one place so I think its probably an error in the page. Thanks Phil This email (which includes all attachments and linked documents) is intended f
R: [DeleGate-En] Problem with delegate proxy
  06/30-18:06 . 4862  Ht Ht2 <p7mjabdyi-rn3efjjgkilr.ml@ml.delegate.org> [88]
___ Hi yutaka, thanks for your quickly answer, I'm a Costantino's colleague. We will try the upgrade at your last release of the tool. Thank you very much. Regards, Mauro Romeo ___ Da: Yutaka Sato [feed
Question about MOUNT
  07/02-15:43 . 4863  florent jose <p74jabdyi-rn3efjjgkilr.ml@ml.delegate.org> [253]
___ Hello Yutaka, I'am using Delegate as a proxy to convert HTTP to HTTPS request. The requests are coming & forwarded from five different secured apache servers with different IP. The problem is it pos
  07/05-07:21 . 4864  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [39]
___ Hi, I'm not sure what your intention is but it might be something as: MOUNT="/* https://192.168.246.135/*" See <URL:http://www.delegate.org/delegate/nvproxy/> for more details. Also be sure that you
Cached directories/files not being removed/deleted.
  07/06-18:50 . 4865  tomatotree <paejqbdyi-rn3efjjgkilr.ml@ml.delegate.org> [46]
___ Sorry if this has been asked and solved before; I couldn't find an answer. The cached directories/files are not being deleted at all. I must 'rm -rf' thesedirectories/files myself. What I want is al
Mount - 404 on some page images/links
  07/07-09:00 . 4866  "Beutel, Philip" <p64jabdyi-rn3efjjgkilr.ml@ml.delegate.org> [24]
___ Hi Yutaka, I've had a bit of a look through the code to have Delegate interpret the &#39; but the code is a bit beyond me, are you able to let me know a few pointers to where and what I should be ch
  07/07-10:04 . 4867  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [36]
___ Phil, It might be as the enclosed patch. Cheers, Yutaka 9 9 Yutaka Sato <y.sato@delegate.org> http://delegate.org/y.sato/ ( ~ ) National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology _< >_
Cached directories/files not being removed/deleted.
  07/10-12:48 . 4868  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [70]
___ Hi, I'm not sure why you need the second CRON= with "-atime +1(day)" while you have the first CRON= with "-expire 10m". The first one should be enough for your requirement because it will remove cac
  07/12-11:31 . 4869  NiNeCaT <paujqbdyi-rn3efjjgkilr.ml@ml.delegate.org> [11]
___ Thank you Yutaka for you reply and time :). You explained it very well and I have a better understanding of it. I have removed the 2nd cron (CRON="0 12,0 * * * /home/use...) and it is working just f
Handle the body mail in SMTP
  07/13-03:38 . 4870  Simon Guilhot <payjqbdyi-rn3efjjgkilr.ml@ml.delegate.org> [144]
___ Hello Yukata, Thanks for your time and your responses. I spend the day working with the product. After spending some weeks using it, I can say that the product are great but I found, at start the ma
  07/13-07:47 . 4871  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [113]
___ Hi, I can't see what didn't work and how. Your CFI scripts for FTOSV seems to work as follows: 07/13 07:40:42.19 [26598] 1+0: -- Fork(FTOSV): 26597 -> 26598 07/13 07:40:42.19 [26598] 1+0: ### execFi
SMTP AUTH LOGIN
  07/14-01:20 . 4872  =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jes=FAs_DIEGO_FERN=C1NDEZ?= <pu4jabdyi-rn3efjjgkilr.ml@ml.delegate.org> [177]
___ Mr Sato, Thanks to your action with 9.9.7 (AUTH LOGIN) we have been able to deploy Delegate as a gateway between simple smtp clients and SSL+Auth BPOS email server. We just finished the stress tests
reverse http tunnel with delegate?
  07/16-18:21 . 4873  "Matthias Waldorf \(Zoom\)" <pgmhqbdyi-rn3efjjgkilr.ml@ml.delegate.org> [21]
___ Dear Yutaka, I need to transfer files from and to a windows machine behind firewall. The only way outside is a http proxy with a lot of filtering. Is there to make a directory on that machine access
  07/16-22:44 . 4874  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [37]
___ Hi, Maybe there are many solutions with/without DeleGate. If your "transferring file" means getting/putting files or making/removing directoies over FTP from a FTP client, then using the "FTPxHTTP"
  07/16-23:35 . 4875  "Matthias Waldorf \(Zoom\)" <pgmhqbdyi-rn3efjjgkilr.ml@ml.delegate.org> [64]
___ Dear Yutaka, this looks good. However, I think I need the opposite way (access the local files from "outside"). Is this possible with FTPxHTTP, too? Best regards, Matthias ---Original Message--- Fro
  07/17-03:41 . 4876  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [80]
___ Hi, It is another dimension. If you can have a (reverse) HTTP proxy on your gateway host (on the boundary of outside and inside), the answer is yes, of course. Yutaka Cheers, Yutaka 9 9 Yutaka Sato
  07/17-04:25 . 4877  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [96]
___ Hi, Maybe I missed to interpret your question. It is technically easy to utilize SSL-tunnel (over a HTTP proxy) to invite TCP connections from outside, but what is difficult is not there but in anot
About delegate problem in Linux other than RedHat
  07/19-10:56 . 4878  pbyjqbdyi-rn3efjjgkilr.ml@ml.delegate.org [110]
___ Hello Yutaka, delegate is a nice app !! I installed delegate in a RedHat 9 machine as a telnet proxy which allow our teammate to telnet outside using another tcp port. In the meantime, I'll also kee
  07/19-13:25 . 4879  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [30]
___ Hi, Do you mean you using "tee" as an external filter program of your DeleGate for Telenet ? If so, I'm not sure but the standard "tee" program will buffer data for its output thus it is not appropr
reverse http tunnel with delegate?
  07/22-00:54 . 4880  "Matthias Waldorf \(Zoom\)" <pgmhqbdyi-rn3efjjgkilr.ml@ml.delegate.org> [126]
___ Dear Yutaka, you may be right. I will try to find another solution for the problem. Thank you for your help! Matthias ---Original Message--- From: Yutaka Sato [mailto:feedback@delegate.org] Sent: Fr
SMTP AUTH LOGIN
  08/02-09:17 . 4881  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [60]
___ Hi, Thank you for your problem report. My intention in the previous modification to do preserve/clear/restore the EHLO cache in the function "doAUTH_LOGIN_SV()" was to ensure not to make any impact
Does the Delegate product allow us to limit access to target hosts and protocols by username?
  08/17-07:11 . 4882  Vietnhi Phuvan <pcijqbdyi-rn3efjjgkilr.ml@ml.delegate.org> [99]
___ Hello, Does the delegate product support user based access control listing? Because from what I see, your PERMIT statement does not appear to support usename ERMIT parameter* == PERMIT=/connMap/ <ht
  08/17-09:53 . 4883  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [42]
___ Hi, Yes. The first option to see is the AUTHORIZER option. AUTHORIZER="-list{user1:pass1,user2:pass2}:http,ftp:host1,host2:*" The above specifies - user1 and user2 are authenticated and authorized t
Does Delegate support user-based access lists, with those users authenticated by a RADIUS server?
  08/20-04:10 . 4884  Vietnhi Phuvan <pcijqbdyi-rn3efjjgkilr.ml@ml.delegate.org> [31]
___ Hello Folks, My own review of the Delegate mailing list in addition to my own review of the Delegate manual lead me to the conclusion that Delegate does NOT support user-based access lists with thos
Problem with Delegate 9_9_7
  08/20-04:42 . 4885  Bob Cowie <pcujqbdyi-rn3efjjgkilr.ml@ml.delegate.org> [34]
___ Hi, We use Delegate at a school as an HTTP/HTTPS cache, on Windows Server 2008. Until this week, we used version 9_9_0, and things worked really well. Then we upgraded to version 9_9_7. Since upgrad
Does Delegate support user-based access lists, with those users authenticated by a RADIUS server?
  08/22-16:53 . 4886  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [25]
___ Hi, DeleGate does not support RADIUS directly. I'm not sure but it might be available via the PAM interface. AUTHORIZER=pam Cheers, Yutaka 9 9 Yutaka Sato <y.sato@delegate.org> http://delegate.org/y
Problem with Delegate 9_9_7
  08/22-17:38 . 4887  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [35]
___ Hi, Is the server for relaying from HTTPS clients to a HTTP server? It is difficult to say something helpful without knowing the detail of your usage of DeleGate, load pattern, the environment, etc.
EPSV support in DeleGate
  08/23-20:18 . 4888  James <pbeiqbdyi-rn3efjjgkilr.ml@ml.delegate.org> [20]
___ Hi Yutaka, I have an issue with the following setup The Origin Server is behind a NAT router and the server does support EPSV.however Delegate doesn't seem to negotiate it. The PASV negotaition resu
  08/23-23:41 . 4889  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [64]
___ Hi, It will be realized with the enclosed patch enabled with an option: FTPCONF=doepsv:sv Cheers, Yutaka 9 9 Yutaka Sato <y.sato@delegate.org> http://delegate.org/y.sato/ ( ~ ) National Institute of
  08/24-08:39 . 4890  James <pbeiqbdyi-rn3efjjgkilr.ml@ml.delegate.org> [95]
___ Thanks Yutaka, I also noticed in the log of this post when you ftp to microsoft delegate logs an EPSV command https://www.delegate.org/mail-lists/delegate-en/4480?Refresh Is the EPSV command from th
  08/24-10:41 . 4891  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [29]
___ Hi, No. FTP commands for data-connection establishment from a client are not forwarded to the server. Those commands are hop-by-hop ones to negotiate with the neighbor, not to be forwarded. In the l
  08/24-10:48 . 4892  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [28]
___ What you can do to use EPSV toward the server with the existing versions of DeleGate is accessing the FTP server by its IPv6 address. Or you need to apply the patch and the option, or wait the next
  08/24-10:56 . 4893  James <pbeiqbdyi-rn3efjjgkilr.ml@ml.delegate.org> [40]
___ Unfortunately they don't have a v6 address. The patch works as expected although the logs don't seem to indicate that EPSV is used. (That is more a cosmetic issue so I can live with that).. Great. D
sslway cert check
  08/28-14:00 . 4894  Gadi Dor <pdyjqbdyi-rn3efjjgkilr.ml@ml.delegate.org> [32]
___ Hi All, I want to use delegate with sslway like this: I have stunnel and openvpn (ssl port): I don't know if it possible, but I want that delegate will be able to check each connection and forward t
FTP port bounce prevention
  09/01-08:27 . 4895  Jacob Lundberg <pdeiqbdyi-rn3efjjgkilr.ml@ml.delegate.org> [32]
___ Hi, One of the ways people try to prevent ftp port bounce attacks and probing is to require in the FTP server that the PORT command must specify the same IP as the originator of the control channel.
  09/05-00:14 . 4896  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [54]
___ Hi Jake, Even if PORT is turned off, clients can establish active connections by using EPRT as "EPRT |1|10.20.30.40|12345|" for example. Thank you for your description of the problem. Maybe I should
  09/05-11:23 . 4897  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [132]
___ Hi, The modification in 9.9.8-pre13 for all of the above extensions is a little large. The enclosed one is just for rejecting FTP Bounce without configurations. Cheers, Yutaka 9 9 Yutaka Sato, CSDP
  09/07-05:19 . 4898  Jacob Lundberg <pdeiqbdyi-rn3efjjgkilr.ml@ml.delegate.org> [73]
___ Hi, Thanks for your quick reply; this is why DeleGate is awesome. I am testing 9.9.8-pre14 right now and it looks very good! -Jacob Jacob Lundberg Director, IT Services pdeiqbdyi-rn3efjjgkilr.ml@ml.
Does Delegate support user-based access lists, with those users authenticated by a RADIUS server?
  09/11-12:12 . 4899  Vietnhi Phuvan <pcijqbdyi-rn3efjjgkilr.ml@ml.delegate.org> [57]
___ I am trying to implement PAM authentication and authorization to access ssh services on specific hosts: specifically, the Employees group should have full access to the local network, while the Cons
  09/11-15:27 . 4900  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [113]
___ Hi, If your solution is correct, you should see it working and I don't have advices to make. By the way, did you get a way to use RADIUS via PAM? If so, the description about what you did on which p
Empty-Articles = [4832]
  admin search upper oldest olders older1 this newer1 newers latest
[Top/Up] [oldest] - [Older+chunk] - [Newer+chunk] - [newest + Check]
Generated:12/12 11:04:34 (4 sec) Expires:12/12 17:04:30 @_@V