Article delegate-en/3702 of [1-5169] on the server localhost:119
  upper oldest olders older1 this newer1 newers latest
search
[Top/Up] [oldest] - [Older+chunk] - [Newer+chunk] - [newest + Check]
[Reference:<_A3700@delegate-en.ML_>]
Newsgroups: mail-lists.delegate-en

[DeleGate-En] Re: Performance on Windows
06 Apr 2007 13:58:41 GMT feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato)
The DeleGate Project


Hi,

In message <_A3700@delegate-en.ML_> on 04/06/07(05:45:55)
you Ed Vander Hoek <poehabdyi-ktwgyordbmlr.ml@ml.delegate.org> wrote:
 |On 2000-00-00 0:0X PM, Yutaka Sato wrote:
 |> The time-stamps in the logfile of DeleGate will be helpful to see where is
 |> the bottle-neck.
 |
 |To summarize the log file:
 |    150ms: initialize connection
 |    100ms: CFI_SYNC
 |    260ms: init SSLWAY
 |    250ms: actual relay
 |    110ms: shutdown connection
 |Total: 870ms

Ooops, it seems too slow :)
I also made similar observation on my machine and saw the latency about
500ms.

In DeleGate/9.6.X, I'm re-implementing built-in filters including Gzip
and SSL based on thread instread of process.  I did it for Gzip in 9.6.0
and SSL is to be done in 9.6.1, but I did a very tentative implementation
for STLS=fcl (or FCL=sslway) as a thread in 9.6.0-pre9 of which binaries
are available at ftp://ftp.delegate.org/pub/DeleGate/alpha/bin-latest9/.
The latency becomes about 100ms in the implementation.

Cheers,
Yutaka
--
  9 9   Yutaka Sato <y.sato@delegate.org> http://delegate.org/y.sato/
 ( ~ )  National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology
_<   >_ 1-1-4 Umezono, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8568 Japan
Do the more with the less -- B. Fuller

  admin search upper oldest olders older1 this newer1 newers latest
[Top/Up] [oldest] - [Older+chunk] - [Newer+chunk] - [newest + Check]
@_@V