Article delegate-en/3692 of [1-5169] on the server localhost:119
  upper oldest olders older1 this newer1 newers latest
search
[Top/Up] [oldest] - [Older+chunk] - [Newer+chunk] - [newest + Check]
[Reference:<_A3691@delegate-en.ML_>]
Newsgroups: mail-lists.delegate-en

[DeleGate-En] Re: Question regarding FTPCONF
30 Mar 2007 14:12:43 GMT Michael Portz <pnihabdyi-5bnwhwdzselr.ml@ml.delegate.org>


Hi Yutaka!

Awesome!!! I'll test it asap!

Thanks loads!
Michael


> From: feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato)
> Date: 29 Mar 2007 18:00:07 GMT
> Message-ID: <_A3691@delegate-en.ML_>
> --
> Hi,
> 
> In message <_A3690@delegate-en.ML_> on 03/29/07(22:39:51)
> you Michael Portz <pnihabdyi-gtouv7envisw.ml@delegate.org> wrote:
>  |I am running the following delegated setting:
>  |
>  | delegated -P21 SERVER=ftp MOUNT="/A/* ftp://srvA/*" MOUNT="/B/* ftp://srvB/*"
>  |
>  |Thus, delegated proxies two different servers in two differents directories.
>  |Alas one of the servers *only* allows passive mode while the other *only* allows
>  |active mode. Can I anyhow restrict the validity of a "FTPCONF=nopasv" parameter
>  |to one of the MOUNT parameters only?
> 
> It is natural to expect that you can specify FTPCONF as an option local to
> each MOUNT point, but it has not been implemented (yet).
> The enclosed patch is a tentative implementation of it, and with it you can
> use FTPCONF in each MOUNT parameter as follows:
> 
>   MOUNT="/A/* ftp://srvA/* FTPCONF=noport:sv"
>   MOUNT="/B/* ftp://srvB/* FTPCONF=nopasv:sv"
> 
> The patch also enables CMAP for FTPCCONF as follows:
> 
>   CMAP="{nopasv:sv}:FTPCONF:ftp:servA"
>   CMAP="{noport:sv}:FTPCONF:ftp:servB"
> 
> The patch will be applied to the next release (9.6.0-pre5).
> 
> Cheers,
> Yutaka

-- 
accom GmbH & Co. KG
Grüner Weg 100
52070 Aachen

Tel: +49 000 000 000f
Fax: +49 000 000 000f

  admin search upper oldest olders older1 this newer1 newers latest
[Top/Up] [oldest] - [Older+chunk] - [Newer+chunk] - [newest + Check]
@_@V